Tuesday, Feb. 26 at 6:30 PM

Hello network, in my opinion this is an extremely important news due to its implications on traditional notions of documentation, authorship and copyright for choreography and new media. I think it is also an important opportunity for projects and work with this material. Please read an comment.! what do you think? I created a group for dance-tech (artist, technologies, theorists...etc) interested in relalizing a sharing project using the LOOPS as source material. Group: Loops/Open Source Projects Merce Cunningham CompanyThe OpenEnded Group New York, NY—Merce Cunningham Dance Company and The OpenEnded Group present the public release of Merce Cunningham’s choreography for his signature solo dance Loops, and the accompanying digital artwork created by The OpenEnded Group, on Tuesday, February 26 at 6:30 PM in the Merce Cunningham Studio. This event is co-hosted by the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts at Lincoln Center. The evening will include a presentation of the choreography and of the digital artwork, remarks from Merce Cunningham as well as Paul Kaiser and Marc Downie of The OpenEnded Group, and a reception. The choreography for Loops will be made available under a “copyleft” intellectual property license (in the form championed by Creative Commons). This will permit anyone to perform, reproduce, and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes. Simultaneously, the digital artists of The OpenEnded Group (Marc Downie, Shelley Eshkar, and Paul Kaiser) will release their digital portrait of Cunningham, also entitled Loops, as open source software. This artwork derives from a high resolution 3D recording of Cunningham performing the solo with his hands. The artists will also unveil a completely new realization of the work, now in color. The open source release will give digital artists and scholars the freedom to study the artwork in detail and to adapt or remix the artwork creatively. The release will also constitute a kind of “living will” for the artwork so that it can be recreated long after current technology has been superseded. This open source release goes beyond Loops itself, for it includes the complete multimedia authoring system, Field, that underpins Loops as well as other of the most technically challenging artworks made to date, spanning realtime graphics, interactive performance, and digital music. The open source release of Loops is made possible through support from the Cunningham Dance Foundation with major support provided by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. All the original materials for Loops will become part of the Merce Cunningham Archive at The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Center. The Merce Cunningham Archive was created unofficially by David Vaughan when he was hired by Merce Cunningham as studio administrator in December 1959. In 1976, his job as archivist was formalized by a National Endowment for the Arts grant for a two-year pilot project. At the end of that period, the Cunningham Dance Foundation asked him to remain as the first archivist in the history of American dance companies. The Merce Cunningham Archive’s works on paper include a virtually complete set of programs of performances, posters and flyers, Cunningham's personal choreographic notes from the 1930s to the present, books and periodicals of writing by Cunningham and Cage, as well as books and periodicals about Merce Cunningham Dance Company. The electronic media works include Cunningham's personal choreographic notes, dating from 1991, constituting some 50 hours of computer files; original moving camera recordings related to Cunningham's film/video collaborations; master films and videotapes; and recordings of performances and rehearsals, recorded interviews, documentaries, and newscasts featuring Cunningham and his work. There are approximately 1000 still images, approximately 200 hours of audiotapes and phonograph records of music relating to the repertoire; and sound recordings of music and of interviews, lectures and symposia, and oral histories. Merce Cunningham Studio is located at 55 Bethune Street, 11th floor, in Manhattan. ______________________________________________ Loops Cunningham created Loops as a solo dance for himself in 1971 and continued to perform it until 2001. Though he originally danced it with his full body, Cunningham soon started channeling its intricate movements entirely into his fingers, hands, and arms. In this form, Loops became the signature solo work of Cunningham’s later career, often inserted as a cameo into Merce Cunningham Dance Company Events. Cunningham eventually set Loops on an artificial “performer,” a software intelligence embodied in an abstract body coded and created by The OpenEnded artists for a virtual version of the work. This digital version of Loops was commissioned by the MIT Media Lab in 2001 and derives from a definitive recording of Cunningham performing the work in a motion capture studio. This recording preserved the intricate performance as 3D data, which portrayed not Cunningham’s appearance, but rather his motion. Cunningham’s joints become nodes in a network that sets them into fluctuating relationships with one another, at times suggesting the hands underlying them, but more often depicting complex cat’s-cradle variations. These nodes render themselves in a series of related styles, rendered to resemble gesture drawings. The Loops soundtrack has two elements. The first is Cunningham reading carefully compiled diary entries from his first three-day visit to New York City in 1937 at age 17, a marvelous evocation both of the spaces of Manhattan and of the young Cunningham. The second is a musical response to the sound and semantics of the narration as well as to the structural changes occurring on screen. This work draws upon sounds from the prepared piano of long-time Cunningham collaborator John Cage and, like the visual elements, creates itself in real-time. Just as the Loops imagery constructs a set of interacting processes that observe and recast the motion of Cunningham’s hands, the new score takes a set of interacting musical processes that listen to and restate the sound and language of Cunningham’s narration. Like Loops the physical dance, Loops the digital artwork is always "performed" live (computed and rendered in real-time), with no two performances the same. As a live performance it suggests the immortality of a dance that would appear to be fleeting and ephemeral. As a subject for creative reinterpretation, the digital work offers something radically new. Since the internal structure of Loops is revealed completely in its visibly open source, re-implementations of it can go far beyond the present-day practice of “remixes,” which operate only on the surface rather than on the structure of the original work.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of dance-tech to add comments!

Join dance-tech

Comments

  • me too!
    you have an incredible drive and are growing as artist. We are in a very good moment but very complex...the politics, our ideals, etc.
    trust me...I am open to feed back but we have to start trying to notice the positive...it sounds corny...it has been helpful for me...
  • well - now that I know what you mean about it just being that the idea will reach presenters... i hope you are right. I hope you know how much I do respect cunningham's work, having chosen to study at OU with Michelle Geller who taught us Cunningham technique and Choreography, and also referencing him in choreobot itself.

    I suppose I am ultra sensitive right now as I've recently begun debating the whole purpose of my career -
    now that i know what you meant by your description, I am ok. sorry marlon - why did i take it that way, coming from you? of course you didn't mean it that way. but how i feel about the nature of the other vital issues remains unchanged. THANKS for the expedient reply. I heart you!

    Jules
  • Hello Julie,
    take deep breath!
    Me and a lot of people know about your work that deserves a lot of respect and it has it for the time that you have been working on it.
    I think that this is very important and it is exactly because of his importance...not only fame...that will be helpful
    I have been remixing and mashing for long time and I know that others have been doing it). I remember when we discussed the ideas about rules for choreography in OU, so I shared ideas with you when I was visiting. So, this was just less that three years ago.

    Cunningham has changed the dance world for..ever...with more than 40 decades of constant innovation and research.
    but he worked for more than 10 years without recognition...you know the story

    so I think that these move is helpful particularly because of his fame...and freakin' genious...
    It will help to shake a bit the paradigms of presenters, about variable works
    I see it as important yet not unique...
    of course...
    remixing in nothing new...
    I think that the ideas or open cultures are crucial for our development...
    I work based on them...
    I think that we have to see the positive aspect...in general...focus on our work and work...and keep working...
    I think that there is nothing to fear...or loosing your space...we just have to keep studying and be a bit humble
    The other thing is the code...
    The code in it self has AL and is very advanced...so again... we can learn from it.
    I am exited...

    I feel like you are reacting like a writer that does't want to read a book of a famous yet good writer...and I understand because I have been there...
    I think Cunningham is not just an institution, and also that they have excellent management...
    we can learn...improve
    I think
  • I have been giving Choreobot away to people and discussing it as my personal affront to issues of authorship and copyright for over a year. I may not have the clout to market myself in the same way as someone like Merce Cunningham does, but it makes me mad that in arts communities the smaller artists are overlooked - because their names are not as large. since when is business the first priority of the arts? I'm seriously disappointed in this. How is it that this is characterized as radically new?

    this is entirely what I was fighting against in removing myself from the equation of my work - by giving it away and offering the software to others for their own independent uses. when merce cunningham does it, his name is all over it, and everyone looks and now suddenly it is "extremely important".... maybe he was less successful at his "copyleft" as he calls it if it is automatically attributed to hisself... as is natural for any big artist -

    on my website for choreobot, there is a discrete link nestled snugly away for anyone who really wants to read about the person who made the patch -

    as for the remixes being a "radically new" idea - shit I've been working on it for over the past year - and have even posted a link and announcement on this site. so yeah, this does hit a personal nerve for me. Not to be mistaken for - how come no one made a stink about me - but more like - this is exactly what i was talking about by doing this kind of work in the first place ....

    over-lauding someone because of who they are or claim to be - name dropping, its all part of the same problem that has propagated in the arts, despite modernism.

    Someone educate me on this - why do we not take the reigns back from the curators and critics who decide what is important, how and who?

    I'm tired of being afraid to say it in front of people who could "make or brake" my career... as if a career in the arts is really worth it if I have to be afraid to express what i see as truth.

    This is my stand against praise for art because of the name power behind it instead of recognizing what is happening right next door to you...

    and if i get burned for saying it, then it was well worth it.
This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives